BAD CHOICE IN BATTLE OF INVESTMENTS PROJECTS

There are some perennial questions in our world and one of them is: Who is better? Every investor decides by himself and he is the one who is responsible for making the decision. But, snatching the chance, it is necessary to take all information into account. So I recommend you using the information provided my analysts of EJC journal, which regularly posts investment projects battles. But unfortunately, those posts are sometimes not well-grounded and unreasonable. And in some cases it is definitely not recommended to have something in common with none of the projects offered by EcommerceJournal.

Here is an example. The project http://www.globas.biz which took part in their battle has been shut down already. And it happened a week later after the battle. The same thing happened with alcfund.com. And again a week later after the battle. Alcfund.com was “fighting” with hugecash.net on July 15, 2010. Luckily Hugechash.com was the winner in that battle. It even seems that editorial staff chooses pairs of projects with the obvious winner. But, I guess, it is not true. Because on July 19, 2010 Scurection (scurection.com) project ended up in a Battler HYIP investment projects. It won in just one category, but neither of two projects won in other categories. Stoking (stoking.biz), which was its competitor, is still operating of course, but I doubt it will last much longer. What is the point of choosing two losers? No other than investors will most likely come off a loser in such battles! Because it is not recommended investing in neither scurection.com nor stoking.biz. But EJC writes mostly about FOREX Trading and ecommerce, that is why it is not surprising why they don`t know much about HYIP.

Martin Eden, HYIPNews.com