Well, doubler programs are those programs that give you back about 200% of your money with principals included (or with the possibility to take them back) in a month. We call such programs "classic". But one of the most evident terms of their classicism is transferring the money directly to your e-gold account.
These programs are popular enough, because their work may be provided with the help of building up a pyramid, and in general, with the help of really active work. Of course, the term is to be no less than 20 days. In additions, the programs with their high popularity keep up within a significant term, enough to get a profit, and are, in our opinion, one of the most important forms of getting a profit on HYIP market.
If not consider all conventions related to the program's site, working principles, etc, the last issue remains: how to invest and reinvest. It is worth to be observed just because you get 200% per month (if get), and you ask yourself - what to do next? The programs live for 2-3 months, and hardly any person rejects from the possibility to get 400% of the profit total. We will try to answer this question.
These programs, that will surely be repeated many times in future, may serve as a perfect basis for having a good lesson - where to invest, how and when. If you started with $100, and then just reinvest them, then you'll receive $300 in 5 months (if take into account that the latter were lost by you during the fifth month, i.e. the program was gone during the fifth month with your money). If you invest $200 the next month, you'd get ... $500:)
Look. You take $100, and invest it. The month is over, you get 200 and leave the money in program (or reinvest). During the 2nd month you get 200. During the 3rd month you get 200. During the 4th month you get 200 again, and our money is gone during the 5th month. Then you have 600. 500 are pure profit. The difference is clear.
BUT IF THE PROGRAM STOPPED PAYING DURING THE 4TH MONTH. Investing $100 each month, you'd get $200. If you chose the strategy of investing $200? You'd anyway get more - $300, regardless of the sum of the risk, you get more!
Let's make the task more complex and fancy that you have a "short" program, and think what we'd get if it closed in 3 months (i.e. you don't get profit during he 3rd month). Investing $100, you get pure $200. investing $200, you get the same 100. the sum changed their places. And we have seen that we'll have a profit of the program will make 3 cycles minimum. Here we don't take into account the case when you make a deposit only once (this example is regarded below).
You may make up a definite dependence. If you increase the sum of the deposit (i.e. you "keep" the money and don't get it back), then your profit grows with the term of the program's work, here, if the program has been working at least 4 months, the risk DOESN'T INCREASE. Only your profit increases. :) if the program has been working less, then... you'll be safe only if you get the money as quickly as it is possible.
In fact, if the doubler will be working for 3 months, you need to get back at once, if you think that it will live more, you need to risk. Now let's think what if you wait for 3 month (not take the money back, but doubling it). Then, the first month is $100 (yours), the 2nd is 200, the 3rd is 400, the 4th YOU GET BACK 800, and only 100 are yours. Pure profit is 700. But we don't give up and deposit 400. And lose them.
How did we earn? JUST $300! See the point? Of course, if we speak about some infinite programs, then you may rotate $100, but most of them keep up from 2 up to 5 months (sometimes 6), and we think that the subject of the talk is possible within the limits of this term.
Then, let's um up..
The program is working within 5 months, and leaves with your deposit during the 5th months.
Scheme 1. You start with 100, and reinvest 100 up to the end, taking back the profit.
Profit is 300.
Scheme 2. You start with 100, don't take back the next month and go on reinvesting.
Profit is 500.
Scheme 3. You start with 100, and wait for 3 months, not taking back, but reinvesting the whole sum. The profit is 300.
Let's decrease the term of the program's work up to 4 months (it closes during the 4th month).
Scheme 1. Profit is 200
Scheme 2. Profit is 300
Scheme 3. Profit is 0
We decrease the term of program's work up to 3 months (it closes during the 3rd month).
Scheme 1. . Profit is 200
Scheme 2. . Profit is 100
Scheme 3. . Profit is 0
If the program is working only for 2 months, then in the first case you only get your money back. Let's fancy impossible thing - the program is working for 6 months. :)
We decrease the term of program's work up to 6 months.
Scheme 1. Profit is 400
Scheme 2. Profit is 700
Scheme 3. Profit is 700
As you seem the return doesn't change in case of a large sum. But the term is too long and if you leave all your money there, you are at higher risk, than leaving $200 there.
Of course, you may invest in the program and take the money back in a month. This is the best tactics. But you should understand that if you invest in three such programs, you risk the same month of a work, because some of them may work 0 months, and in this case you fail.
As regards to the rest, it's hard to define when such program is about to leave, and if it is possible to work with it. We advice not to invest in case you haven't controlled the development of the program since the beginning. And of course, experience will allow you to see how long the program will work and what to do with deposit basing on our calculations.
As you see, the profit is bigger, if you reinvest, and the program is working for LONG, but the profit is less if it leaves fast. It may be equal to 0. Then you need to choose an optimal alternative according to the risk degree defined by you. And the figures described here are to help you, we are sure!