How to Decide whether to Invest or Not

Updated: 03/17/2006 09:31
Reprints/Permissions  Hyip Monitor
Any programmer knows what is algorithm and probably many educated people also know what it is. But not every person thought over the fact that algorithm allows in many cases escape the problems related to the factors that are not significant in principle, but may significantly influence decision-making and violate your strategy. I think that investor strategy is an important factor of his activity.

His way to success and the possibility of reaching success depend upon the reasoning and correctness of his steps. And decision-making algorithm may help avoid these impacts in many cases. I want to demonstrate you a sample algorithm of decision-making related to investing in program, which may be used by you as an example, if you really realize how it is necessary to work out strict rules of actions while taking part in HYIP seriously.

Pay your attention to the focus on "taking part in HYIP seriously". Many of the amateurs may not understand to what degree such activity planning may be important, but as soon as you try you will probably see how much this action provides for you. We just try to give you as many tools as it is possible, for these tools serve for your moneymaking. :)

Each algorithm appears as the result of defining some conditions. They are specific for every person, and they are worked out as the result of those settings that we call strategy. Of course, you need at first work out a strategy, and in this article we base on a assumption that you have a ready strategy, which you implement into practice now.

At first we take the program. Program reveals after spam newsletter or looking through monitoring sites, it doesn’t matter. This will be the first step. You may define some conditions for the first step. For instance: I don’t invest in programs advertised by means of spam. So if you received a spam letter, this program may not be observed as the candidate for making a deposit.

Or in case you may learn later that the program is advertised by means of spam, and you reconsider your decision. But you need just to answer this question. You may also exclude definite monitorings that showed themselves negatively, or do not satisfy you by some reasons.

Do you see now that it’s simple? But why many investors do not use these strict settings and go on making mistakes, betraying their principles? If you lose the money, but do not violate your principles, do you need just to reconsider these principles? But how can you find out what is erroneous and what’s not, if you don’t have the principles written down as such simple algorithm. Of course, not. So let’s go on.

The face of the program is its site. I would regard the site from the position of evaluating its quality. So, the second step for me is examining the site. I answer the questions: how quality design is, how much info is represented about admins and if I’m satisfied with the means of moneymaking that are described on the site. If yes, we proceed. You may also make up a mark scale. Such parameters of evaluation are widely used by various monitoring services that are familiar to all and it’s not necessary to speak about them now.

Then I examine the content of the site and plans – this is the most important. This is the third step. It includes defining how valuable the program is in their offers. It may pay 200% a day, and I put down: the programs paying 200% daily won’t go. Then these guys are excluded. The next step is analysis of how the program is paying: whether it pays directly to the golden account or is it necessary to withdraw the money constantly? What are the administrative charges of the program and how they are collected.

Another step in your algorithm may be analysis of referral system, if it is important for you. For instance, if the interest rates are high, administration is probably a pyramid, and you don’t want to deal with such suspicious programs. Then the question will be as follows: what are the interests paid out from each new member registered on your referral link. If higher than 10%, then the answer is NO (if you don’t invest in this program). If lower, the answer is yes, and you move to the next step.

Here you may contact the administration or something like that. I choose contacting admins. And the step is as follows: if admins answered my letter within 24 hours, I move to the next step. If not, I don’t invest in this program. The next step if ADMINS REPLIED WITHIN 24 HOURS - this is checking out style and the main point of the letter.

If it is quality, I go on to the next step, if not, or if administration doesn’t want to communicate with me, I DON’T INVEST, i.e. the answer is NO. It is necessary to define the alternatives and the ways out of these alternatives. Otherwise, each time you’ll need to decide as if you haven’t tried to work out a perfect algorithm, which should serve as a mechanism and a general rule of your work.

Succession and number of the steps, terms and additional actions may include as many items as you wish, but the more details will be provided, the more accurately you’ll define the reasons for the problems and mistakes. Now I’d recommend you to sit and write all that you do before investing, and think it over. To see how it works, and compare to the results of your work… and then start reading this article since the beginning. :)

Thus, the final step is creating a deposit. The major factor here is the sum (if it exceeds the maximal sum defined by the plan). It may also depend upon another info, which you receive from the program. For instance, I enter the following dependence: if doubler, the sum is $150, if daily payouts - $50-100, if it pays more than 10% weekly (in sum and total), then the sum doesn’t exceed 500.

If it pays less than 1% a day, than the sum exceeds 500 (but this is under the condition that my personal mark is higher than 5) etc. If you see that you lose the money, investing according such algorithm, you just watch each step, because you decision about making a deposit is incorrect and something disturbs you. For instance, your scale of marks to site quality is not perfect, or you neglect it.

Then you should exclude this item, and rely on the mark provided by HyipNews. If the situation is better, then you follow the right way. The most important thing is consecution and methodicalness. And you will succeed! And we wish this to you as well.

About the author

Lella Prior has been at HYIPNews for five years. She is an articulate, confident person who relishes challenges and working under pressure. Lella Prior has been taking much care about writing. The greatest strengths are the research, communication and writing skills Lella has. Thanks to the work at HYIPNews Lella Prior has an excellent opportunity to write good quality content.
You May Also Like